When classifying impression techniques it’s important to distinguish between the therms ‘step’ and ‘phase’. Put simply, steps are the number of times the impression tray is inserted into the oral cavity, followed by the number of phases which are the viscosities of material used where necessary.
One Step Techniques
The impression is taken in one step after preparation. The impression can be one viscosity (monophase) or two different viscosities (two-phase/blaminar/tray and wash).
The materials recommended for this technique are polyether or monophase viscosity addition silicone. A custom impression tray is recommended to reduce wastage on material.
Steps:
This is carried out using putty and light or heavy and light consistency addition silicone. If putty is used, a stainless steel tray is used with adhesive added before the preparation. This is because putty will deform aluminum or plastic trays while being pushed downward then rebound on removal of the tray, resulting in smaller dies and poorly fitting restorations. If heavy viscosity silicone will be used to load the tray then a custom impression tray will reduce wastage of the material.
Steps
Two Step Impression Techniques
An impression is taken before preparations then a second wash impression is taken with the same tray. The method can be done spaced or unspaced.
Steps:
This is carried out using putty and light or heavy and light consistency addition silicone. If putty is used, a stainless steel tray is used with adhesive added before the preparation. This is because putty will deform aluminum or plastic trays while being pushed downward then rebound on removal of the tray, resulting in smaller dies and poorly fitting restorations. If heavy viscosity silicone will be used to load the tray then a custom impression tray will reduce wastage of the material.
Steps
Evaluation of an impression
A quality control routine for impressions must be incorporated into clinical work. The following points must be verified
Digital Impressions
Digital impressions in the clinic are taken using an intra-oral scanner.
Previously, scanners needed the surfaces of the dental arch to be powdered with titanium dioxide to give a uniform surface topology. The scanner can take either a series of pictures or video.
Scanning is technique sensitive. Gingival retraction or its alternatives are required for all current intra-oral scanners. Different systems require different scanning protocols, so there is a definite learning curve.
Studies show that scanners are highly accurate when scanning prepared teeth and implants in local regions. Current case studies are showing similar reliability in full arch preparations and implants. Current scanners with colour scans can aid the discrimination of the tooth-coloured margin from the surrounding soft tissues. In the future Ultrasonic 3D imaging options can
penetrate soft tissue, negating the need for gingival retraction, though such devices are highly experimental at present.